Dennis Patterson, a former premier of the Northwest Territories, said after the bill passed that it would ". Donna Dasko, who was on the committee that studied the bill in the Senate, said she thinks "it is quite a good bill."Ĭonservative Sen. "I believe we should be doing it," said Duncan. However, several Independent senators rose to speak in favour of the bill, including Yukon Independent Sen. He said it "will be devastating for the Alberta and Saskatchewan economies." Michael MacDonald was one of a few from his caucus to make final pleas with his colleagues to not proceed with the bill. The Senate committee that reviewed the bill recommended in May the entire Senate vote down the bill in its entirety, but that didn't happen, leading Conservatives to accuse the Independent senators who make up a majority in the chamber of being Liberals in disguise.Ĭonservative Sen. The government accepted a Senate amendment requiring a mandatory review of the tanker ban in five years. Ian Dundas, CEO of Enerplus, discusses his skepticism about Trans Mountain's next steps, concerns about Bill C-48's ban on some tankers and Bill C-69's impact on pipeline approvals.īill C-48 imposes a moratorium on oil tankers north of Vancouver Island. "Mark my words," he warned, "these people will let them know exactly how they feel this October."Įnerplus CEO skeptical on Trans Mountain's next steps due to past 'reckless' handling David Tkachuk said the government has done resource-dependent communities in Alberta and Saskatchewan a "disservice" by rejecting the Senate's amendments to C-69. They're both destined to be fodder for Liberals and Conservatives on the campaign trail to this fall's election.Ĭonservative Sen. The House of Commons called it quits earlier in the day on a sombre note, with MPs delivering condolences following the death of Conservative MP Mark Warawa.īut Canadians haven't heard the last about the pair of bills. The pair were among a long list of bills the Senate pounded through late into the night Thursday as the chamber prepared to adjourn for the summer and the subsequent election. Passing Bill C-48 would only exacerbate unity issues: Brad Wall.'It's better that it die right now': Green Party's May on Bill C-69.premier calls Ottawa's Bill C-69 response to amendments 'concerning' Richard Neufeld called C-69 "one of the most toxic, polarizing and divisive bills" he's encountered in 10 years as a senator. The two bills put to the test senators' policy of generally bowing to the will of the elected House of Commons when there is a dispute between the two parliamentary chambers about legislation.Ĭonservative Sen. The Senate made more than 200 amendments to that bill earlier this month, but the government accepted only 99 of them, mostly to do with reducing ministerial discretion to intervene in the review process. It applies to a wide range of projects including interprovincial pipelines, highways, mines and power links. A bad day for our economy, and the Canadian federation.Ĭ-69 imposes more requirements for consulting affected Indigenous communities, widens public participation in the review process and requires climate change to be considered when major national resource-exploitation and transportation projects are being evaluated. This means the No More Pipelines Law will become law. Now the Senate has given final approval to Bill C-69 by a vote of 57 to 37, stripped of the amendments put forward by the Government of Alberta and business groups.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |